Skip to content

Posts from Overall rating for all games.

Rating systems. Closed Topic
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
I tried to calculate the general rating across all parts. I only considered tournaments with more than five participants, namely: the first Heroes 5 tournament, the first Heroes 1 tournament, the second Heroes 2 tournament, the New Year's Heroes 2 tournament, the Heroes 3 BB tournament, all three stages of VK, and the skeleton collection tournament.
I used the following formulas for the calculation:
1 - R1(n)=S(1)/S(n)*100, where R1(n) is the player's non-linear rating, S(1) is the leader's result, and S(n) is the player's result.
2 - R2(n)=100-100/(N-1)*(n-1), where R2(n) is the player's linear rating, N is the number of placed positions, n is the position of the player being considered, and the minimum result = 5 points.
3 - Oscillator R(n)=(R1(n)+R2(n))/2
4 - Bonus = ((R(i) - M(i))/N)*square root of K, N is the number of participants, R(i) is the player's position in the rating of that tournament considering everyone's ratings, M(i) is the player's place in the tournament, and K is the tournament coefficient, equal to the average rating of that tournament for all players.
I suggest everyone review the results.
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
The bonus is calculated based on the position a player SHOULD occupy in the tournament, given the presence of certain opponents. For example:
A player finished fifth in the first tournament and third in the second, but the top four did not participate. According to my system, this player should have won (since he is ranked first among those who participated). He finished third and will therefore receive a negative bonus!
In reply to AlexeyPank
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
AlexeyPank;73498
The bonus is calculated based on the position a player SHOULD occupy in a tournament, given certain opponents. For example:
A player finished fifth in the first tournament. In the second, they finished third, but the top four didn't participate. According to my system, this player should have won (since they have the highest rating among those who participated). They finished third and will therefore receive a negative bonus!
So, the situation I described cannot happen? However, even so, the calculation according to your system is very laborious and difficult to verify for errors, in my opinion.
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
It's time-consuming, yes. But you can check it; I've posted the formula. You just need to have the tournament ranking in front of you and use it to determine the players' positions.
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
The ranking has been updated to reflect the completed skeleton-collecting tournament. Congratulations to Iron Axe on reaching the top spot in the overall ranking.
In reply to AlexeyPank
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
AlexeyPank;79428
The rating has been updated to reflect the completed skeleton-collecting tournament. Congratulations to Iron Axe on reaching the top spot in the overall rating.
Thank you. The General-Universal rating, of course, reflects activity in tournaments across different versions; at least, it does for now. I didn't even realize I had moved up. I'll publish my rating a little later, after the results for the second stage of the Kanigham tournament are announced, including the skeleton-collecting tournament, so I don't have to redraw the tables twice.

P.S. AlexeyPank, I looked at the tables. It seems there's an error of this kind. The general tables list the player DeMoN and ***DeMoN***. Are these perhaps the same player? People are getting creative with nicknames, and it's already hard to keep track of everything with these calculations. Also, K@lb@zzer and K0Lb@zzeR - but this glitch isn't the player's fault; it's probably a coding issue, as we've discussed before. ;)

P.S. Now, my idea about aging the rating by 33% should be clearer. The general table will continue to grow as new players or nicknames are added. Those who have participated in a tournament at least once will not disappear from the table over time. The calculations will become more complex, and errors will be inevitable. :(
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
A new rating update has been released, taking into account the second stage of the tournament. Zingel has taken the first place with a lead of less than one point. Congratulations to him.
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
The rankings for Heroes 2 in the Tournament Results thread have also been updated. The update specifically for the VK rankings will not be available until Friday at the earliest. I have already calculated everything; I just don't have time to publish it. By the way, the first discrepancies in rankings have appeared due to different rating systems. This includes different leaders for different versions. ;) Stay tuned for the results!
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
The results of the VK tournament have been updated: /topic/2131/. As promised, discrepancies in the rating systems have appeared!
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
The player rating has been updated to account for the issue with "Demons." It was just one player.
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
And I also fixed the issue with the Kolbasers.
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
The general ranking has been updated. Dear IronAxe is taking a significant lead, and this applies to all ranking calculation methods in VK!
The VK results update will be available a bit later, when there is time.
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
The rankings for the VK tournament have been updated: /topic/2131/. Congratulations to IronAxe on taking a commanding lead.
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
The general player rating has been updated. The lead of the respected IronAxe is now simply enormous. Congratulations to him.
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
The general player rating has been updated based on the results of the Blitz and the "Operation Capture" tournament. Congratulations to vbn for taking first place in the 3v3 category, and to IronAxe for maintaining a strong lead.
In reply to AlexeyPank
User Avatar
19 years ago
Auto-translated
AlexeyPank;103020
The General rating has been updated based on the results of Blitz and the "Operation Capture" Tournament. Congratulations to vbn for 1st place in the trio competition, and to IronAxe for their solid leadership.
Could you please tell me where these ratings are located? Instead of creating one topic… there are thousands here… :)

Here's what I found:

VK – per tournament:
/topic/2077/

VK – combined across three accounting systems:
/topic/2131/

VV + Blitz:
/topic/1754/

Discussions and suggestions regarding the calculation of personal ratings:
/topic/1565/
/topic/1406/
/topic/1316/
/topic/1917/
/topic/2039/

Discussion about Clan rankings:
/topic/1894/
/topic/1906/

Clan ranking:
/topic/2086/

Online:
/topic/2455/

Esteemed moderators! I kindly request that you create one General topic called "Rating" and move all discussions regarding the systems for calculating individual ratings and clan ratings (discussions, announcements, and results), as well as ratings for different tournament formats – Blitz, VK, VV, etc. – there. There are already a dozen or so topics scattered throughout the forum… The most discussed issues right now, but it's becoming difficult to navigate through all this variety...

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb

Users Online 1 users 1293 guests