Posts from Shadowverse: Starforged Legends

Well, I've played all the matches. Can we share our decks now, or should we wait until the end?

No one does that, absolutely no one, you understand? Not in Magic: The Gathering, not in Hearthstone, whether it's a live event, an online one, or even in games like Pokémon – nowhere is there an open registration system without the ability to change your deck... And I'm not even mentioning the simple implementation of a ban on a specific deck.

In short, your time is over, buddy. Let someone who has at least worked as an admin in a board game club and has organized events before run the tournaments, okay?

Neither in Hearthstone, whether it's the live version, the online version, or games like Pokémon, is there an open registration system without the ability to change your deck.

What's going on there?
And yes, Reven, you still haven't answered whether I can show off my decks?

I don't see any reason why not.

Have you played in many tournaments, Hero?

Yay. Revenant allowed using different builds for one class, but, I must say, I only used this feature a couple of times and played most of the games with three decks that I trusted the most. I didn't change anything in them during the tournament. OTK Roach Forest Not the most optimal build, the homecoming is not really needed now (I don't know why I added it, maybe against Death Breath), the amulets are frankly annoying, but it worked well, especially against Blood. True, a couple of times I was extremely unlucky when neither the roaches nor the goblins came. Recently, I found a more solid build using Air Elementals, and I want to have some fun with it. Midrange Shadow Again, not the most optimal option, but I got the third Cerberus later, and I didn't change the deck. Only two Tanas and two Balance Lords, but even with this number, the deck worked well. The Tyrant is used as a surprise tactic, and a couple of times it really saved me, even if the effect didn't work, but three damage from hand was just vitally necessary. Yes. I don't like Midrange Shadow. But I really wanted the Azazel emblem, and Neftitka stubbornly didn't come, and I was afraid to play with it in the tournament. Vengeance Blood A classic build, quite close to the optimal one. I almost didn't play Vengeance before the tournament, and this build unexpectedly worked out great, two 4/4s on the fourth turn is strong. And since few of the opponents were able to burst me down from 10 HP, the game was relatively safe. I played with these decks only one and a half times, although I like them much more. Control Blood Also a good build, although maybe I should add a second Cthulhu, because I destroyed all the others. I played it twice, and it turned out that both times were against almost the same deck. Unexpectedly good, despite the variety of finishers, everything is in its place, the deck is very cool, and Azazel is not useless. Both times it helped, I was engrossed in controlling the board, and the opponent was sitting with almost full HP, and then I played Azazel and cut his HP in half, while putting a strong minion on the board, and the opponent didn't have that many resources left. Control Neutral (Wallet) Forest I only used it once today - I got upset, so to speak, when I lost a match with the OTK deck and remembered that the Wallet Forest is higher in the tier list than the OTK one. A very cool deck, if you manage to drag out the game, then you are usually in a favorable position, there are a lot of resources, you can just exhaust the opponent. The Wallet pack is not fully assembled, but even this amount is usually enough.

It’s enough to know that in regular events, not friendly gatherings, no one ever changes the decks they registered with after registration, especially when each participant has free access to the decks chosen by their opponents.

Dude, on no normal site do decks open up for amateur tournaments; they only open in the lobby during a match. And you can’t, for example, see what decks the players you’re facing are using. Only the admins know that.

Added 2 minutes later
Even recently, I watched a stream by Pukich; he was running a NutsBet tournament, and he only found out his opponent’s lineup in the lobby when it was time to ban.

No, I meant crafting, not the decks themselves, or whatever you call them. By the way, the overall stats can be displayed.

And you can't, for example

You yourself wrote at the beginning of the topic that you pick, so what's the problem?
Moreover, you are deviating from the topic of your complaints, which are about something completely different. After you send the crafts, you can no longer change them.

I even watched Pukich's stream not so long ago

I'm not even surprised.

It’s pointless to talk to you.

Queen

5 -> beautiful;
3 -> average;
4 -> old and simple effect, but I like it.

Lucifer

5 -> beautiful;
2 -> nothing special;
3 -> plus for the evolved version, mediocre without it.

Laura

2 -> poor drawing, mediocre girl;
3 -> never heard of her, let's give her a three;
2 -> a gimmick for try-hard players.

Urd

4 -> the drawing isn't impressive, but the girl is very cute;
3 -> pleasant voice, but nothing more;
4 -> still useful even in 2017.

Gabriel

3 -> if it weren't for the evolved art, it would be a two, never liked her;
3 -> see Urd;
1 -> garbage, uninteresting effect.

Moon

4 -> not a big fan, but very cute;
5 -> good;
3 -> too weak in 2017, but still like it.

Merlin

2 -> face, pose;
3 -> generic;
2 -> not a viable hero in the late game.

Magisa

4 -> I like the girl, the drawing is so-so;
4 -> I like the voice and the variety, but there's something off-putting;
1 -> ).

Warlock

4 -> still not bad;
4 -> I like it;
2 -> cannon fodder that doesn't even always get a chance to attack, a waste of a slot.

Nun

2 -> not my thing;
5 -> surprisingly good, I don't see a reason to rate it lower;
1 -> vanilla garbage, without a ward, and not even a strong one.

Gilgamesh

4 -> still not bad, good thing there's an evolved version;
5 -> see Nun;
2 -> outdated, and was intended for poor players from the start.

Trooper

1 -> never liked her;
2 -> objectively 3-4, but similar to the previous point;
3 -> vanilla garbage.

Sniper

4 -> terrible drawing, the girl is top-tier;
5 -> very good;
1 -> 4/5/1 ))) but not as bad as the Magma Ranger from Heroes, thanks to the existence of an evolved version

Vampire

4 -> used to dislike her, but okay, I won't lower the rating for the evolved version;
3 -> I don't like the voice, but the voice acting is good;
1 -> garbage since vanilla.

Added 9 minutes ago

Even recently, I watched a stream by Pukich

I'm not even surprised.Ugh, ugh, hahaha, maybe you also watched House 2, hahaha)) I didn't watch it, I only switched to it once and immediately turned it off! and you're a loser! guys, look at the loser! I don't watch %вещьнейм%, so I'm morally and intellectually superior to you, hahaha, I don't even KNOW who Oxxxymiron is because I don't pollute my brain)) hahaha



(s)))) 2017, the information age, an internet user.

Phew, phew, hahaha, maybe you even watched "House Two," hahaha! I didn't watch it; I just switched to it once and immediately turned it off! And you're a loser! Guys, look at the loser! I don't watch %вещьнейм%, so I'm morally and intellectually superior to you, hahaha. And I don't even know who Oxxxymiron is because I don't waste my brain on that stuff! Hahaha.

What the hell are you talking about now?

Just posting nonsense, don't take it seriously. I didn't expect to hear such a "thought" from you.