Mafia 24. Spy Paranoia Auto-translated

No one told me anything.

Well, you figured it out yourself, didn't you?)

Everything is fine. We thought everyone was a maniac, and now we're just confirming it. Although, it's funny to read how some people deny it and claim they don't know what we're talking about. Lol, you're executing the only person who wouldn't have killed you in the night. And yet, you still want to win. Oh, that's some female logic.

Yeah... getting into something like this after New Year's is tough =)

What's with everyone attacking Arch? O_o He's just sitting there, smoking in a purple haze, and let him sit.

I'm voting for NNV, because forget it)))

But to the point:
What if the town was simply at a disadvantage in the first night? Let's say the killers targeted the agile player and were blocked. Or maybe someone was targeted by the Engineer but was saved by the Doctor? I'm marking everyone who just wanted to execute Ara as wanting to "take advantage of the situation" to get rid of a strong player.

What if the town resident was simply in a favorable position during the first night? Let's say the killers targeted the nimble character and they blocked it. Or what if someone was targeted by the engineer but was saved by the doctor?

The night information didn't mention these neutral roles. So, if there are neutral roles other than the mana roles, they either have a kill role or they don't have a role. Another option is to consider the doctor (who might have died before their role was revealed) or the non-use of roles by other town roles (but what town roles would need to do that? Or were they aware of what was happening, which is why they didn't use their roles?).

Perhaps they are not explicitly mentioned, or not in a "classic" way. My hypotheses about the 16 maniacs raise significant doubts. However, on the other hand... we need to wait for the second newspaper to come out in order to draw final conclusions.

Hostor is here. In a slightly worn, but still functional state. I wouldn't execute anyone, not even Arandor, who's been causing trouble and roaming around on Skype. I'll even forgive him for that collective "confirmation."

There's no evidence because all the attempts failed. Later, there will be evidence. Even if I have to invent it.

The day will end in a few hours when I come up with an event.

If anyone doesn't like something, they can complain to the GM/curse the GM/ask the GM to resign. It's your right.

There is no evidence, as all the assassination attempts failed.

That's what I'm talking about, fellow spies.

But there are still a lot of crazy people. Right?

Ar, read the GM's post again. How can there be many of them if the killings didn't happen? Think about it yourself, there aren't many ways to save a player from death, so if there were many killers, there would be killings.

At least 4 maniacs). But in this case, the point is this: half of the players are maniacs, and the other half are defenders (or something similar). The maniacs failed to kill, but their targets still "died" (as a joke).

Hey, bird-brain :D And you're going there too)) Why write so many roles then? To distract attention? Well, I'm having a hard time believing in such a mess right now.

No, I even asked who killed whom, and those people were on the list of those who were killed. So, most likely, my version is correct.

Well, I don't know. Okay, I'd rather wait for the second day.

Hmm, if I manage to.

It just so happened that a few popular players were targeted at night, and maybe someone else is experiencing the same issue as me. I was fighting Hermit, and he randomly played in his favor, and then he pretended to be clueless about what was going on.