Skip to content

Posts from Life Buildings

5.0 (1 rating)
Open
Which warriors do you hire when playing for survival?
93 voters
Single choice
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
#1
Auto-translated
Favorite wars in the game?
Please elaborate.
User Avatar
#2
Auto-translated
well, what's there to explain... follow the archers!
User Avatar
#3
Auto-translated
For archers, this is certainly the right approach, but if you consider the speed of ballistas, it becomes quite tedious. Therefore, I first decide whether I will immediately engage in battle or focus on defense... :)
If it's for defense, I place ballistas (let them sit in the castle tower and not venture out), otherwise - pikemen.
Мечты сбываются, просто нужно уметь правильно мечтать.

Жизнь нужно прожить так, чтобы Боги в восторге предложили еще одну...
P.S. может мне и предложили, просто я не помню :smile44:
User Avatar
#4
Auto-translated
However, ballistas can attack without limitations, even through city walls. If you're going to replace units with melee fighters, it's better to replace monks with crusaders.
User Avatar
#5
Auto-translated
Here's the question: should a pepper be placed on a ballista?
User Avatar
#6
Auto-translated
well, in principle, yes, that would be more realistic!
User Avatar
#7
Auto-translated
I just saw screenshots where a guy was sitting, but I don't have that unit.
In reply to UTER
User Avatar
#8
Auto-translated
Ballista - Monk - Champion. Archers have always been strong; even though Ballistas are slow, they are more effective than Pikemen, and Champions are my favorite. Everyone I know builds Angels, but I prefer Champions. I've gotten used to leading these guys on the battlefield, and they make me very happy... even though Angels have resurrection... I still prefer Champions. :cool:
Делай вещи, дела-делай вещи и не залипай!8)
User Avatar
#9
Auto-translated
Champions are good with their first strike! Against a good hero, four champions can be defeated in one strike, while 30 champions don't even take half of a Barbarian's life... and if they also have a Ring of Life and a Ring of Regeneration, they're doomed! P.S. The Barbarian attacks twice!
User Avatar
#10
Auto-translated
so, should you only play as Barbarians and with only one hero?!))))))))
User Avatar
#11
Auto-translated
It's not easy; if you gather to defeat the Barbarians, you need to try hard! It's quite difficult to defeat them due to their good defense, attack, and damage.
And a Knight of the same level will lose to him; let's look at the characteristics:
The Knight has Tactics + Attack, and even if he takes Warfare, the Barbarian has an advantage: Warfare + Hand-to-Hand Combat, meaning that at level 2, he can already upgrade these two skills to level 2 or take Archery or Magic Resistance!
In reply to RomaShSh
User Avatar
#12
Auto-translated
Ballistae, Crusaders, Angels. :)


User Avatar
#13
Auto-translated
I want all of them, and even more!!! And with a Barbarian, you can take down a Castle...
In reply to RomaShSh
User Avatar
#14
Auto-translated
RomaShSh;24706
It's just that if you gather to defeat the Barbarians, you need to try hard! It's quite difficult to defeat them due to their good defense, attack, and damage.
And a Knight of the same level will lose to him. Let's look at the characteristics:
The Knight has Tactics + Attack, and even if he takes Warfare, the Barbarian has an advantage: Warfare + Melee, meaning that at level 2, he can already upgrade these two skills or take Archery or Magic Resistance!
I'm not arguing that the Knight will lose; it's obvious.
In reply to UTER
User Avatar
#15
Auto-translated
UTER;24751
I agree that the Knight will lose; it's obvious.
Yes, that's true, unless they have armies, i.e., face to face. ;)


Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil