Posts from Round 2 of voting to determine the Criteria for participation in the AK Elections.

The second round of voting for determining the Criteria for participation in the Elections of the Arbitration Committee (AK) is announced.

The following two options will proceed to the second round:

1) A player with a rating of at least 3 months and who has completed at least one online (official) tournament in Heroes 3 on Volde;

2) A player with a rating of at least 3 months and who has completed at least one online (official) tournament in Heroes 3 on Volde, or a player with a rating of at least 3 months and who has played 15 online games in Heroes 3 on Volde across all Seasons, or a player with a rating of at least 3 months and who has organized at least one online (official) tournament in Heroes 3 on Volde (in the poll, this option will be referred to as - Option Loi).

Players are requested to vote for the option that will be the Criterion for participation in the Voting for the Elections of the Volde Arbitration Committee.

1 & (a|b|c)
well, strictly speaking, this is a variation of "Cache-Loy"...

The options are practically identical. The Loi option is slightly wider, so I'm voting for it.

I accidentally clicked and voted for the wrong option :( In short, I'm voting for the Loï option.

Accidental click, voted in the wrong place :( Anyway, I'm voting for the "Loi" option.

Damn, I'm used to restarts :D

Heh:) it's still interesting how different options are created in polls:) under the first option - let's say A, the second option is conditionally B = A + C + e + ... Even without voting, it's not difficult to understand which option will win, so why have this voting at all? Something seems very wrong in this world - nonsensical topics, nonsensical polls... Why?

Heh:) it's still interesting how different options are created in polls:) the first option is conditionally A, the second option is conditionally B = A + C + e + ... Even without voting, it's not difficult to understand which option will win, so why have this vote at all? In my opinion, something has become very strange in this world - nonsensical topics, nonsensical polls... Why?

Why, in my opinion, everything is normal.
The first option is stricter, and the second is more liberal, that's all the explanation.
Players suggest a certain option, it is reflected in the poll, and that's it.

I suggest removing the possibility for moderators to be in the Academy. No offense, but it would be fairer.

I suggest removing the possibility of moderators being in the Academy. No offense, but it would be fairer.

I am quite surprised by your post... We have good moderators, and their authority and competence make them worthy candidates...

And what is the injustice here? What difference does it make whether someone is a moderator or not in the Academy? I think moderation wouldn't prevent anyone from also doing their job in the Academy.

Although I haven't been registered here for long, I voted for the second option because it is more democratic, or rather, less harsh than the first.